Welcome to week 2 of Consumer Behavior! This week's chapters focused on american values, demographics and social status, but we're going to be looking a bit deeper into american values and how they relate to advertising.
What exactly is cause-related marketing (CRM)? Put simply, it's when a company has a marketing campaign that ties into a relevant issue or a cause. This is usually with a goal of improving sales and image while also providing benefits to the cause. Take the following picture as an example:
This cause-related marketing campaign tied Wendy's drinks to the Dave Thomas Foundation for Adoption. If you buy a Wendy's drink, complete the heart, and post it online with a hashtag, Wendy's would donate $5 to the charity. Here's another example:
The shoe company TOMS had a campaign in which, when you buy a pair of their shoes, they would donate one pair to a needy individual in another country. A pretty good campaign, right?
Simply put, this type of marketing is meant to make the user feel good about themselves while they purchase an item in their usual routine. This good feeling is then associated with the company, and they are usually viewed as charitable or giving back to their community. However, some critics consider this type of marketing to be unethical. They view it as a company trying to make money off of a charity or take advantage of a movement to get more revenue. And to be honest, I mostly agree with these people. CRM, at least in the modern age, has proven to be a way for many companies to become superficially involved with issues that they have no meaning in communicating about. Take for example Gillette's recent advertisement on toxic masculinity:
I had the burning question that many individuals had to this advertisement: Why is a shaving company for men feel like they need to contribute to the #MeToo Movement? This advertisement, in my opinion, felt extremely forced and way too much like they were produced for the sole reason of generating interest for the company. I had the same reaction as many skeptics to CRM. I saw this example as the company having this campaign merely to backpack on the idea and take advantage of the viewership generated by the movement itself.
While it seems like I may have a lot of negative things to say about CRM, I do see the benefit in having it. Even if the motivation for the companies involved is purely monetarily-based, CRM does have the ability to generate revenue for a charity, as seen by the Wendy's and TOMS campaigns. It can bolster campaigns and even politically-charged movements, spreading awareness and garnering support. Despite this, I just can't see myself seeing it as anything but selfish for the companies practicing it.
With the many resources available to these large companies, their help in generating donations and information about charities can sometimes be immense. Some would argue that perhaps that is worth looking past the unethical tinge that CRM leaves on many individuals' tongues. As for myself, I think I'll stick to campaigns started by the core charities themselves.